Saturday, January 23, 2016

Social Security and The Mess It's In

Subtitle: Win By Living Past Age 80

Social Security payments are a staple of many retirees in the US.  The monthly check may be the only source of income.  For others, it may supplement a pension, savings, a tax-deferred savings plan such as a 401-k plan, or investment income.   This post provides some insight into how Social Security reached its present condition, and dispels some common misconceptions.  

The agency was created in 1935 to provide "old age benefits" for the elderly.   The system works today by collecting a percentage of most workers' paychecks (not all workers, though), and disbursing monthly payments to eligible persons, mostly retirees.   

One of the commonly held beliefs is that Social Security does not pay back the money a person paid in during his working life.  That belief may be true, but then again it may not, depending on circumstances.  More on this below. 

At first, the number of people paying into the system was much, much greater than those on the receiving end.   Only a small percentage was required from each worker's paycheck. 

Under the system today, the employer contributes 7.65 percent of the gross pay, and the employee also contributes 7.65 percent for a total of 15.3 percent.   There are annual limits to how much the government collects from each person, with the compensation amount for 2015 set at $118,500.   Fifteen-point-three percent of $118,500 is then $18,130 paid into Social Security.   However, a small portion of this now goes to Medicare, so that Social Security actually receives 6.2 percent from each of the employee and employer.   Note, for additional detail, the 1.45 percent for Medicare applies to all earnings.  

To make the system somewhat easier to follow, the remaining part of this article uses 15 percent.   

For a person who has earned and still earns the maximum annual income, and is due to retire in 2016 at age 66, one can determine the amount he would have paid into Social Security as 45 years of working (age 22 through age 66) and beginning salary of $17,700 and final salary of $118,500 in 2016.   For simplicity, the calculation assumes a linear increase in salary over the 45 years, and the average salary was $61,000.   The total amount paid into Social Security was $413,700.   The maximum monthly payment to the retiree in 2016 is $2,663, with the annual amount of 12 payments at $31,956.   To recover all of the money paid in, the retiree must collect for 12.9 years, or to age 79.   Should he live longer, he collects more than he paid in.   This is based on no interest on any of the funds. 

The same is true, essentially, for the retiree who elects to retire early at age 62 or at the older age of 70.  He collects a lower monthly amount at 62, but breaks even at age 79.   
Therefore, it can be seen that a person will not receive back the money he paid in if he dies before age 79.  

In the US, mortality statistics show that only approximately 83 percent of those who are soon to retire reach age 62, and only 78 percent reach age 66.   More importantly, almost the entire cohort of the current group, the Baby Boomers, are expected to die by age 80.  Only approximately 1 or perhaps 2 percent will live to age 80 and beyond.    The 20 percent (roughly) that paid into the system but died before age 66 will not receive any money.  However, there is a provision for widows and widowers to receive money based on a deceased spouse's earnings.  

Also, unlike a private investment, social security payments to do not flow into the deceased's estate for distribution to heirs.   

The chart below shows the expected survival rate of Baby Boomers, by age.   The graph is interpreted as having 100 people alive at age 14.  Then, at every subsequent age, one can determine the number of people still alive.  This includes deaths of all causes.   The curve is the average of all persons, including male and female, and all races.   As is widely known, women live slightly longer than do men, and whites live slightly longer than do blacks.  Asians live slightly longer than do whites.   Reasons for these disparities in longevity are written about extensively in various literature sources.  
From statistics on mortality from Center for Disease Control
One of the issues with Social Security is the large cohort of Baby Boomers that will retire over the next 10 to 15 years.  The assertion is that too many people will be collecting Social Security relative to the number of people in the workforce that are paying into the system.

How does one create more people working, to pay into the Social Security system?  Many policy decisions in the past have worked against such an outcome.  High wages, in part driven by organized labor and in part driven by government minimum wage laws, led to manufacturing in overseas factories where labor rates are lower.    One has only to remember, or perhaps look up, the unions that held strikes over increased wages.   This ultimately led to fewer jobs in the US.   Also, higher wages and reduced costs of some forms of manufacturing led to jobs lost to automation.  An example that is on almost every street corner is the loss of bank teller jobs, as automated teller machines, ATMs, were placed on sidewalks and in businesses.   Many, many other jobs also were replaced by automation, such as robotic welding machines in manufacturing.   Another way that jobs were lost is from excessive environmental regulations, such as the US EPA and state agencies.   Where possible, many companies moved their manufacturing to other countries where investment in pollution reduction equipment is not required.  The US lost those jobs, likely forever.  

The above shows three reasons for fewer US workers: high wages, automation, and environmental regulations.    To create jobs lost by the above, policies must either change, or some form of job creation must be found that is not subject to those policies.  

However, there are also reasons why Baby Boomers live longer than previous generations and live to receive Social Security benefits.   The trend in longevity has increased for many years.  One reason for longer lives is the reduction in tobacco smoking, which smoking is known to cause deadly cancers and other illnesses that lead to early death.    Better nutrition and exercise also contribute.   Improved medical science also contributes to longer life, especially the ability to detect and treat or cure some forms of cancer.   

Also, Baby Boomers enjoy a safer society in many ways.   Automobiles with seatbelts and airbags, and the very design of cars that makes them safer are two such ways.   The interstate highway system, with its separation of traffic, also makes driving much safer.  Before the interstates existed, city-to-city travel was via two-lane highways in many areas.  Passing a slow vehicle required pulling into the on-coming traffic, rapidly increasing the car's speed, then pulling back into the proper lane.  Many accidents and deaths resulted.   Finally, the last example is probably controversial at this time in the nation's history with gun violence and gunshot deaths in the news almost daily.  However, the FBI's national murder rate statistics show 5.02 murders per 100,000 population in 1960, compared to 4.39 per 100,000 in 2014.  We live in a slightly safer world.  

Conclusion

The best way to get back the money one paid into the Social Security system is simply to live past the age of 80.  Should enough people actually accomplish that, by whatever lifestyle modifications they adopt, government will make funds available to meet the obligations.   Baby Boomers, in particular, have voted and will likely continue to vote on such issues until there are simply too few left to matter.   That "won't matter any more" date is likely only 20 to 25 years away, given the above statistics on survival rates and age.    After that time, the year 2035 or 2040, Baby Boomers' demise will have other far-reaching impacts on the US, but that is a topic for another time. 

Roger E. Sowell, Esq.
Marina del Rey, California

copyright (c) 2016 by Roger Sowell - all rights reserved.  




Epic Snowstorm - Blizzard in Mid-Atlantic 2016

Subtitle: Just Another Storm - Or Indicator of Cooling?

Update 1 - (Winter storm frequency on East Coast, with graph from NWS - end update 1)

A few years ago, I wrote an article based on a speech I made to Southern California chemical engineers (see link), on the topic of global warming versus global cooling.  In that speech, I described what serious winter storms can do, and how difficult it is in the US to cope with them.  (note, that article is one of the top two most-read articles on SLB).   

Today, we see a massive blizzard with heavy snowfall that impacts almost 88 million Americans (the figure varies, depending on which report one reads).  Snowfall totals from the National Weather Service are shown below - and note, this is from about half-way through the snow event.  (these are in inches, so metric-based or SI based readers can convert as appropriate.)   (see link to a recent article from CNN)

The most snow, thus far, is 28 inches in West Virginia.  


...SELECTED STORM TOTAL SNOWFALL IN INCHES FROM 1100 PM EST THU
JAN 21 THROUGH 900 AM EST SAT JAN 23...

...WEST VIRGINIA...
TERRA ALTA 1 N                       28.0                    
PHILIPPI                             24.0                    
MIDDLEWAY 1 NNE                      22.0                    
ROWLESBURG                           22.0                    
OMPS                                 21.5                    
ROCK CAVE 3 ENE                      20.1                    
MCGEE 3 WNW                          20.0                    
ROMNEY                               20.0                    
THOMAS                               17.0                    
WESTON                               16.5                    
PETERSBURG                           16.0                    
PRINCETON                            15.0                    
ALBRIGHT                             14.0                    
BLUEWELL                             14.0                    
GLENVILLE                            14.0                    
ROWLESBURG 9 ESE                     14.0                    
COLFAX                               13.5                    
CHEAT LAKE 4 ESE                     13.0                    
DEER RUN 2 WSW                       13.0                    
MASONTOWN                            13.0                    
RENICK                               13.0 
...MARYLAND...
OAKLAND                              24.0                    
RIDGELEY 1 NW                        23.0                    
GAITHERSBURG 1 ENE                   21.5                    
WESTERNPORT                          21.5                    
MONTGOMERY VILLAGE 1 SE              20.5                    
GERMANTOWN                           20.0                    
MCHENRY 2 NNE                        20.0                    
NEW MARKET                           18.0                    
NORBECK 1 ESE                        17.6                    
FREDERICK                            17.5                    
OLNEY                                16.0                    
COLLEGE PARK 1 SW                    14.0                    
BWI AIRPORT                          12.4                    
BALTIMORE 2 SSE                       9.9                    
POTOMAC 1 ENE                         9.5                    
...PENNSYLVANIA...
CHAMPION 4 SE                        23.0                    
MARKLESBURG                          23.0                    
DOVER                                22.0                    
BEDFORD                              20.5                    
DUNCANNON                            20.0                    
FARMINGTON                           19.5                    
FLATWOODS                            19.0                    
CHAMPION                             18.0                    
FISHERTOWN                           18.0                    
ROXBURY                              18.0                    
YORK                                 18.0                    
PHILADELPHIA INTL AIRPORT            13.0
...VIRGINIA...
BLUEMONT                             20.0                    
CENTREVILLE 1 SE                     20.0                    
CHANTILLY  2 NNE                     19.0                    
MASSANUTTEN 1 SE                     19.0                    
PHILOMONT 2 W                        18.8                    
BROKEN HILL 2 WSW                    18.0                    
INDEPENDENCE                         18.0                    
OAKTON                               17.5                    
STEPHENS CITY 2 E                    17.3                    
LEESBURG 1 ESE                       17.0                    
VIENNA                               17.0                    
DULLES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT         15.2                    
ALEXANDRIA 1 E                       14.8                    
REAGAN NATIONAL 1 WSW                14.0                    
ROANOKE                              11.5                    
...KENTUCKY...
LAWSON                               19.4                    
ARGYLE                               19.0                    
LIBERTY                              19.0                    
BEATTYVILLE 3 W                      18.2                    
ULYSSES                              18.0                    
GRADYVILLE 2 NW                      17.0                    
SALYERSVILLE 6W                      16.5                    
JACKSON 4 NE                         16.2                    
NEW MARKET 3 SSE                     16.0                    
LANCER                               15.5                    
BOWLING GREEN                        11.0 

...NORTH CAROLINA...
OLD FORT 5 S                         16.0                    
FAIRVIEW                             12.0                    
LINVILLE                             12.0                    
SUGAR GROVE                          12.0                    
CELO                                 11.0                    
CRUMPLER                             11.0                    
CRUSO 5 ENE                          11.0                    
MARSHALL                             10.0                    
SCALY                                10.0                    
BLOWING ROCK 4 W                      9.0                    
WAYNESVILLE 3 NNW                     9.0                    
BOONE                                 8.3                    
ASHEVILLE 2 W                         8.0                    
ETOWAH 1.9 NW                         8.0                    
VALLE CRUCIS 1 SSE                    8.0  

...ALABAMA...
HARVEST 5 SSE                         3.5                    
CROSSVILLE 1 NNE                      2.5                    
HUNTSVILLE 1 NNE                      2.0                    
MADISON                               1.4                    

...WASHINGTON DC...
THE WHITE HOUSE                      13.0                    
WASHINGTON 1 ENE                      7.0                    
CHEVY CHASE VILLAGE 1 S               4.8                    
NATIONAL ZOO 1 WSW                    4.1                    
THE MALL                              3.5                    

...DELAWARE...
NEWARK 3.9 SSW                       12.0                    
PORT PENN                            11.1                    
NEW CASTLE COUNTY AIRPORT             9.7                    
FELTON 3.6 NE                         9.5                    
DOVER AIR FORCE BASE                  9.0                    
NEW CASTLE                            8.3                    
WOODSIDE                              7.5                    
LAUREL                                7.4                    
GLASGOW                               7.1                    
HARRINGTON 2.1 ENE                    7.0                    

...GEORGIA...
DILLARD 3.5 NE                        7.5                    
MACEDONIA                             6.0                    
CLAYTON 8.5 W                         4.9                    
RABUN GAP 1.1 WNW                     3.0                    
CLEVELAND                             2.0                    
HELEN 3.7 ENE                         2.0                    
WALESKA 5 ENE                         1.0                    

...NEW JERSEY...
HOWELL TWP                           14.0                    
WILDWOOD CREST                       12.0                    
BRICK TWP                            11.0                    
MOUNT HOLLY WFO                      11.0                    
NEPTUNE TWP                          10.0                    
TRENTON                              10.0                    
MORRISTOWN                            9.5                    
DENNISVILLE                           9.2                    
LINDENWOLD                            9.2                    
ATLANTIC CITY INTL AIRP               9.0                    

...NEW YORK...
OSCEOLA 1 E                          15.0                    
IRONDEQUOIT 1 ESE                     9.5                    
HOLLIS HILLS                          9.0                    
NORTH GREECE                          9.0                    
IRONDEQUOIT                           8.5                    
FORESTVILLE 2 SW                      7.5                    
NYC/LA GUARDIA                        7.2                    
NYC/JFK AIRPORT                       7.1                    
ISLIP                                 7.0                    
CENTRAL PARK                          6.0                    

...OHIO...
IRONTON                               9.5                    
WOODSFIELD 1 NE                       9.0                    
CLARINGTON                            7.5                    
ATHENS                                7.0                    
STOCKPORT                             7.0                    
CALDWELL 1 SSE                        6.5                    
SCIOTOVILLE                           6.0                    
WINTERSVILLE 1 NE                     2.5                    
CADIZ 2 WSW                           2.0                    
NEW PHILADELPHIA 2 W                  1.5                                     

...SOUTH CAROLINA...
CHESNEE                               7.0                    
LANDRUM                               6.0                    
TRAVELERS REST 8.9 N                  5.5                    
CHESNEE 3.9 SW                        3.5                    
GREER 5 NW                            3.0                    
TAYLORS 6.1 NNW                       2.8                    
LYMAN 5.3 WNW                         2.5                    

...TENNESSEE...
LAFAYETTE W                          13.5                    
CROSS PLAINS                         11.0                    
JAMESTOWN                            11.0                    
WHITE HOUSE 7 ESE                    10.0                    
GREENBRIER 1.4 N                      9.5                    
SAMBURG                               9.0                    
DICKSON 6 NW                          8.5                    
DRESDEN                               8.5                    
MOUNTAIN CITY                         8.0                    
NASHVILLE 4 SW                        7.1                    
CLARKSVILLE 3 NNW                     7.0                    
LIVINGSTON 10 SE                      6.5                    
GOODLETTSVILLE                        6.0                    

It should be noted that several states have shut down all but essential services, power is out in many areas, many deaths have occurred, and residents are urged to stay home, "hunker down," and be prepare for several days of being self-sufficient.   Snow of two feet in the level areas will make drifts via wind into several feet high.   So, what does a guy in Southern California know about snow?  Only what I observed from living in lake-effect snow in Ohio for a few years during the late 1970s and early 1980s.  We routinely had snow of 24 inches or more.   Drifts were six to ten feet.   

There is a great disagreement between what the US, and many perhaps most countries, state officially about global warming, and my views expressed here on SLB about the coming global cooling.   (see link to "Warmists Are Wrong - Cooling Is Coming," from  May, 2012)

Here is an excerpt from the Warmists Are Wrong speech:

"Clothing:  we will need a lot more warm clothing.  This means synthetic fibers. 

Shelter:  almost all of what has been built in the last 70 years or so was during the warm climate. Much of it is not insulated to handle the type of cold that is coming.  I foresee a booming insulation business.  The flat roofs on buildings, not necessarily in California but in the rest of the world and in the northern part of the United States, may not be adequate.  We may need to have some different type of roofs installed.  The roofs must shed snow.

Medical supplies and health services: I believe we will be overwhelmed. Look at the relative death rates from hunger and cold, comparing heat to cold periods.  More people get sick and more people die in the cold winters.

Transportation and industrial output:  this will be huge.  We do not move barges over frozen rivers.  We know this.  When a river is frozen for many months out of the year, how can you get your materials moved?  What about trains or heavy ground transportation; will they work? Probably not. The train is going to cross the Rockies’ grades in the snow and ice?   Likely not.

Industrial output: how does one move materials around?  How do we get raw materials into the factories and the products out?  If we have seen big trucks trying to go up even a small incline during an ice storm, well, they don't.  We can not get trucks to go up or down the Grapevine incline here just north of Los Angeles when snow falls.  Multiply this 1000 times across the northern tier of the United States.

Communications and infrastructure: we know what happens when ice storms or big snowstorms occur.   The system fails.  Why does it fail?  It is due to ice on the lines or tree limbs falling on the lines.  Can you imagine this on the scale something like the Little Ice Age?  We’re going to need serious reconsideration of infrastructure.

Water supply: what does one do for water when everything around you is frozen? Well, you melt the ice.  But, what do you do for heat?  What if you need that heat just to keep the house warm?

Here's another one, population migration: it is entirely possible that some of the northern cities, talking about New York, Chicago, those type of places, where people give up and become what we call permanent snowbirds. They are moving south.  The implications there are huge. It is okay if one hundred thousand people migrate every winter, but what if we have multiple millions on a permanent basis?  We are not equipped to handle this.

Waste disposal: what will we be doing in the wintertime month after month after month when trucks cannot collect the garbage?  Where do we take it?   I don't really know. As engineers, I hope we can help solve these problems.  It probably will require many disciplines and cooperation between disciplines. " 

It appears that almost all of the issues mentioned in that speech are true during this blizzard, perhaps the populations migrating are not happening, yet.  

And one of the photos from that article, showing a cheerful man shoveling snow at a house.


These blizzards and severe snow storms are events to carefully note, and record their frequency, intensity, and location.   It should be noted that NOAA, knowing that this is an El Niño year, predicted a wetter and colder winter for the southern tier of the US, but a warmer and drier winter for the East Coast and northern states.   

This blizzard is impacting the northeast, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York, as well as the other states shown above.   It remains to be seen how far, and how extensive, the snow and severe weather will be from this January 2016 blizzard.    It is about halfway done, as of this writing (noon central time 1/23/2016).

When blizzards such as this occur more often, and are longer-lasting, perhaps the False-Alarmists will finally admit that cooling is occurring.  

UPDATE 1 - 1-23-2016:  A list of major winter storms - East Coast - turned up quite an 
interesting result.   This is from NWS, for the Albany, NY location.  
Frequency by Year, and Month (January =13, February =14, March =15, etc)
The graph above of winter storm frequency shows more storms occurring after 1960, and 
the spread of the storms is greater.  Some severe storms are occurring as early as October 
(10 on the vertical axis), and as late as April (16 on the vertical axis).    A cooling world 
would  have more frequent winter storms, and they would occur during more months and 
not merely during December, January and February.   However, it seems a bit odd that zero winter storms happened from 1915 through 1950.   This will bear more investigation.  -- end update 1.


Roger E. Sowell, Esq.
Marina del Rey, California
copyright (c) 2016 by Roger Sowell - all rights reserved.   



NOAA Claims 2015 Hottest On Record - Wrong

Subtitle: US Pristine Areas Show No Warming Trend

This being mid-January, it is the time when summaries of last year are announced.  NOAA, via the NCDC (National Climate Data Center) announced this week that 2015 was the warmest year ever recorded when both land and ocean records are considered.  Well, that may be true, given the false and misleading data that is in their database, and all the adjustments to that data.   This post shows some of why the NCDC conclusion is not valid.   In short, the land temperature data for the US from pristine areas, the USCRN data, shows a cooling trend since 2004 and 2015 is far from the warmest in that data.   What NCDC includes, wrongly, is data from known warming locations such as cities and other sites where artificial warming occurs.   In addition, 2015 was the warming phase of an El Niño, so ocean temperatures are temporarily a bit warmer than usual.  

As written before on SLB, (see link  to "Cities and UHI Warming Corrupt Temperature Databases,") the cities are warming, have warmed, and will continue to warm no matter what provides the electricity, heating energy, and transportation energy to them.  The simple facts of a great amount of heat being dissipated in a relatively small area creates a heat bubble.   More population in cities over time creates an even greater heat bubble.   It is a simple, but stark fact that even if all electricity on the planet were from hydroelectric dams, a source that creates zero carbon dioxide, CO2, and every vehicle was electric, plus all energy used in the cities was electricity, the warming bubble would still exist.  For False-Alarmists to conclude that CO2 in the atmosphere must be reduce to prevent catastrophic global warming is simply false.  Even if CO2 production ceased 200 years ago, the temperatures as measured by NCDC would still show a warming trend.  

From the NCDC website (see link),

"The January–December map of temperature anomalies shows that warmer-than-average temperatures occurred across the vast majority of the globe during 2015, combining to bring overall record warmth for 2015, at 0.90°C (1.62°F) above the 20th century average. This easily surpasses the previous record set just last year by 0.16°C (0.29°F). The global temperatures were strongly influenced by the strong El Niño conditions that developed during the year. The 2015 temperature also marks the largest margin by which an annual temperature record has been broken. Prior to this year, the largest margin occurred in 1998, when the annual temperature surpassed the record set in 1997 by 0.12°C (0.22°F). Incidentally, 1997 and 1998 were the last years in which a similarly strong El Niño was occurring. The annual temperature anomalies for 1997 and 1998 were 0.51°C (0.92°F) and 0.63°C (1.13°F), respectively, above the 20th century average, both much lower than the 2015 temperature."

2015    0.90 deg C above average
2014    0.74
1998    0.63
1997    0.51

Here is the map that NCDC refers to in the first sentence.  This shows land and ocean by different colors, with cooler in blue and warmer in red.  
from NCDC website 23 January 2016
It is notable that NCDC did not mention, that I could locate, the cooling (blue areas) in the eastern Canada, southern Greenland, and north Atlantic areas.   It is a feature of good science to discuss the contrary data that is opposite to one's conclusions.   A valid reason should be put forth for why the contrary data exists.  Only a few hundred miles apart, eastern Canada is cooling, while the remainder of Canada was hotter than normal.  Also, the map above shows the western Atlantic Ocean hotter than normal, while the north Atlantic is much colder.   Yet, we know the Gulf Stream carries warm water north and a bit east across those same areas.    Similarly, the region around Japan is colder, yet surrounding areas are warmer.   No mention of these differences.  

While this will be covered in more detail in a future post at SLB, the USCRN data for 2015 from pristine sites shows no warming trend for the contiguous states for the relatively short period (11 years) of the USCRN data. 

Conclusion

The fact is, and has been for a long time, that the official keepers of the temperature records reach their conclusions of alarming, rising temperature trends by over-inclusion of data that has no business being included in such temperature databases.   To put it in the simple vernacular, "Cities gonna warm."   Also, fact-finding and analysis of temperature-measurement sites in the US show that most of the sites also have artificial heating and are not measuring what they are intended to measure.   The was recognized a bit more than a decade ago and resulted in the creation of measuring instruments in pristine areas, the USCRN sites that are far from human influences such as cities, power plants, and asphalt parking lots.   NCDC and NOAA's problem is that the USCRN data is only a decade long, perhaps a bit longer for the oldest sites.  The USCRN data is not global, being limited only to the USA.   SLB has a post on the first decade results from USCRN, see link.   The results for that decade, 2005-2014 (inclusive) show a pronounced cooling in the contiguous US, with a severe cooling trend for winters.   A short record, of only ten years, is subject to pronounced end-point effects.  We can expect that additional years may change the trend a bit until a longer period exists.   An update to that USCRN post is imminent, likely in early March 2016 when the data for the full winter 2016 is available. 

Roger E. Sowell, Esq.
Marina del Rey, California
copyright (c) 2016 by Roger Sowell - all rights reserved.   


Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Los Angeles Gas Well Leaking - Drilling To Fix It

Subtitle:  Vilified Precision Directional Drilling To The Rescue

(Updated, see end of article. ) 

Approximately 12 weeks ago, a storage well for natural gas began to leak just on the outskirts of Los Angeles, California.   The odor is intense in the nearby communities and many residents have been moved, relocated.   Schools have been closed, and the affected students are being sent to nearby schools.   

There have been dozens of articles written on this, and official information exists on various websites such as the South Coast AQMD (see link).   The well is in some danger of blowing out and spewing a great quantity of odorized natural gas over the western portion of Los Angeles.  

The AQMD site states: 

"Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) operates a natural gas underground storage facility (Aliso Canyon Storage Facility) at 12801 Tampa Avenue in Northridge, CA 91326. Aliso Canyon Facility’s underground storage reservoir has the capacity to store over 80 billion cubic feet of natural gas.  SoCalGas operates about 115 injection/withdrawal wells at this location. SoCalGas injects natural gas into the underground reservoir at this facility when the demand for natural gas is low and withdraws it when the demand for natural gas is high.   

On October 23, 2015 SoCalGas discovered that a well used to inject and withdraw natural gas from the underground storage reservoir at their Aliso Canyon facility (known as Well SS-25) was leaking. Initially, it was expected that the gas leak would last no longer than several days or weeks, at the most.  However, despite several attempts by SoCalGas to stop the leak, natural gas is continuing to leak from the underground reservoir through Well SS-25 and its surroundings."   (note: Sempra Energy is the parent company of Southern California Gas Company.)

The facts, to the best of my knowledge, are that the well was drilled in the 1960s as an oil well.  Once the oil ran out, and many years later, the well was one of dozens of similar wells that were converted to accept pressurized, odorized natural gas as a means of storing the gas during low-demand periods.  When the demand for gas increases, the gas company withdraws the gas from the storage wells and sends the gas via pipelines to customers.   Such gas storage and withdrawal facilities exist across the US.   This one at Aliso Canyon is the largest in Southern California.   

When this well began to leak, SoCalGas attempted several times to stop the leak by the usual and customary methods, primarily pumping a thick fluid known as "mud" into the well.   However, this well did not respond and the leak increased.   The quantity of gas and its odorizing compound created irritation and discomfort to the residents in the nearby community of Porter Ranch.   

The situation attracted the attention of several state agencies and the Governor of California, who declared via proclamation "that a state of emergency exists in Los Angeles County due to this natural gas leak."  see link  

Since efforts to plug the well via mud injection failed, SoCalGas is drilling two relief wells to meet the leaking well at a prescribed depth.   The relief wells take time to drill and reach the target.  If successful, the relief wells will reduce the pressure in the leaking well and allow the leak to be plugged.   see link to Department of Conservation's Fact Sheet on the well. 

What is important to note is that the relief wells being drilled are using precision directional drilling (PDD), the same technique that is used all over the country and world-wide to economically drill and produce oil and natural gas from formations, including shale gas.    PDD is used along with hydraulic fracturing to produce much more oil and gas than was possible years ago.    It is commonly stated by the media that fracking is a new technology that causes all sorts of issues, including earthquakes and contaminated water.   Both accusations are false.   

The new technology, in fact, is not fracturing.   The new technology is the gradual improvement in directional drilling, until today it can be called precision directional drilling.   One superb example of PDD is the ExxonMobil oil field offshore of Russia's Sakhalin Island.  That oil field is several miles offshore, and thousands of feet below sea level.   The drilling rig is on the island near the mainland.   Drilling more than 6 miles horizontally, and 8,500 feet down, the PDD reached the oil formation that is only 490 feet thick.   As one executive described it, this is similar to standing at one end of a basketball gymnasium, then pushing a long pipe cleaner through clay and hitting a golf ball at the far end of the gymnasium.    In short, PDD works.   

At Aliso Canyon, the PDD must reach a depth of approximately something greater than 500 feet, but it must intersect with the existing well that is only a few inches across at that depth.   If the leaking well is 4 inches diameter at that depth, or perhaps 6 inches, the precision of the PDD must be very, very good.   The well is approximately the diameter of a softball, but the distance may be as much as one and one-half miles.    

It is for this reason that the gas company has not offered any guarantees that the relief wells will work.  However, there are good reasons to think that they will, eventually, reach the distressed well.   The current schedule is for the wells to intersect in mid to late-February and for the leak to be stopped in early to mid-March.  

It is ironic that the very same technology that many complain about, and condemn as causing so much trouble, is what will be used to rescue an old and leaky well that is approximately 50 years old.    It is also ironic that PDD is what has allowed so much natural gas to be drilled and produced, and created a surplus of supply so the price of natural gas has declined to slightly less than one-third the peak price of a few years ago ($14 then, and $4 now, approximately).   The low natural gas price leads to lower electricity prices, since much of California's electricity is produced by clean-burning natural gas.   In addition, the US no longer imports LNG, instead, LNG is now produced for export to other countries.   PDD is a modern miracle of applied technology.  

As the situation at Aliso Canyon develops, there will likely be updates to this post.  

Update 1 - 1/23/2016:  SoCalGas states that they expect the well to be shut in by the end of February.    Well, we shall see.   Drilling such relief wells does not always go as planned.  -- end update 1. 

Update 2 - 2/13/2016:  SoCalGas states they have temporarily shut in the well, with the gas flow stopped.   The relief well was successful, hitting the leaking well with precision directional drilling.   Next, the leaking well will be permanently capped by injection of a special concrete mixture that will harden and seal the well.   However, the situation is not over, not by any means. Lawsuits will drag out for years.  Regulators are discussing tighter rules.  State agencies are evaluating the Aliso Canyon storage facility for suitability for long-term use, and the implications that has for energy security (electricity shortages and blackouts).    --   

see link to "Implications of Closing Aliso Canyon"
see link to "Natural Methane Seeps are Very Common" 
see link to "California: As Gas Leaks, Pressure for Regulation Builds"----end update 2.  

Roger E. Sowell, Esq.
Marina del Rey, California

copyright (c) 2016 by Roger Sowell - all rights reserved



Dr Robert Carter - Thoughts on His Passing

Today is a sad day for me, and many in the science community, as we learned of the death of one of climate science's great men, Dr. Robert M. Carter of Australia, age 74.   
Bob Carter, climate scientist
1941-2016


Bob, as he was known, was what many refer to as a climate warming skeptic.  He followed the data, and the scientific method, and came to conclusions that are at odds with the Warmists, what I refer to now as the False-Alarmists.   That made him unpopular with the university that employed him, and he was discharged.   That, alone, says volumes about the state of climate science in the world.  

I met Bob here in Los Angeles a few years ago, at a dinner where he spoke a short bit.  I sat next to him at the dinner and had a great time meeting him and discussing all sorts of things.   I also had the privilege of hearing him speak as a panelist at the Heartland Climate Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, in summer of 2014.  

There are several blog-based tributes, and internet page tributes to Bob and his memory.  Among the comments on those, a distinguished scientist, Dr. Roy Spencer, lamented that soon enough, skeptics like Bob and himself would be gone as nature takes us all in the end.   He went on to say that there are no younger scientists stepping up to carry on the skeptic side, and he named specifically his own research using the satellite data for atmospheric temperatures.   His words: ". . . we have no one to take over production of the UAH satellite dataset when John Christy and I are gone."  (note: UAH refers to University of Alabama at Huntsville)

With all due respect to Dr. Roy Spencer, I want to disagree.   I suspect that younger scientists will find it a bit easier as the years go by, and the predicted catastrophic warming does not occur.  At that point, skeptic scientists would, and should, be eager to perform the research that attempts to explain what went so badly wrong with the False-Alarmists data and methods.   As an example, the data from the USCRN, the Climate Research network, that has only pristine sites for temperature measurement, shows a pronounced cooling in the US over the past decade.  More ominously, the winters show a much faster cooling trend compared to the overall annual data.  Even more ominously, the northern tier of the US shows the fastest cooling trend of all.   see link for details. 

The second reason I have for disagreement with Dr. Spencer is from my private discussions with scientists who are on the verge of retirement.  Several that I have spoken to assure me that the only reason they presently remain silent is they want to keep their jobs.  But, once retirement is upon them, they are free to speak well, freely.   There will be some, perhaps many in that category.   It would be improper for me to name any names of those who are waiting until their retirement day.   However, given the very large Baby Boomer generation that is about to retire, there will be a considerable number of such people.  

RIP, Bob.   You will be missed.   We will carry on in the tradition of obtaining valid data, following that data after sound analysis, and delivering supportable conclusions.   

Roger E. Sowell, Esq.
Marina del Rey, California
copyright (c) 2016 by Roger Sowell - all rights reserved



Saturday, January 16, 2016

The California Goal - Us Four And No More

Subtitle: California Dreamers Need A Lesson In Reality

This post is about the long-term goals in California, as a state, as an economic entity, and the public policies (official, and unwritten) that are or will be implemented to achieve those goals.  The opinions here are mine, but the facts are publicly available.  

In short, California has zero appetite for growth, not population growth, nor economic growth.   The title block, "Us Four And No More" refers to my slogan for this phenomenon, but it is adapted from usage long ago.   Each of the "Four" in the California slogan refers to 4 million population, so "Us Four" is then 16 million population.   A quick look at the population history shows that 16 million is almost exactly the California population in 1960.  

Year      Population, millions

1950       10.5
1960       15.7
1970       19.9
1980       23.7
2015       39.1 (estimated)

The California of 1960 is spoken of wistfully by many people, how it was unspoiled, uncrowded, air was clean, water was plentiful, it was an ideal place by many accounts.   Of course, many of the state highways and interstates were not built then (the first interstate highways began construction in the late 1950s). 

In sharp contrast to today, where the population is straining 40 million, air is polluted, freeways are jammed, parking is impossible to find, housing is outrageously expensive, rents are also very high, jobs are scarce, companies are moving away instead of into California, liberal or progressive views dominate every election and almost every elected seat, water is in chronic shortage, crime is bad and getting worse, racial tensions are high and grow worse with each year, illegal immigration is a big and growing problem, schools are scary places for students to attend and little is learned in them, unemployment is high, taxes are high, in short, there is very little to like about modern California.    

Modern California also imports many things that formerly were made in-state, this list includes automobiles, airplanes, oil for refineries, natural gas for all its uses including power generation and heating fuel, even water is imported from the Colorado River.    Importing Colorado River water is perhaps not a fair criticism since the river does border part of California.  However, it is a fact that automobiles are no longer made in California, unless one counts the few electric cars made by Tesla and perhaps a few other small players.   Airplanes were built here once, but no more.  Oil is and has been for many years imported via tanker ships into the state's refineries, although some oil is also produced in-state.  Natural gas is also imported via pipeline, but again a bit of natural gas is produced in-state. 

What the state seems to have in abundance is food.  California has great amounts of farmland, dairies, and beef cattle production.  However, the agriculture is heavily dependent on water availability.  

One can observe the state's long-term intentions of zero growth, or negative growth (back to the Us Four And No More - 16 million population) by simply observing a few basic infrastructure issues.  First, is water.  

Water in California is a perennial topic due to frequent shortages, droughts, and woefully inadequate storage.  In a state with adequate rain and snow, plus a huge and extensive mountain range with hundreds of valleys, one might expect that water storage would not be an issue.  Yet, it is.  The explanation is that state officials may say one or various things, but the reality is that no more storage is being provided.  Instead, state officials insist that citizens must conserve, use less.  There are now fines and penalties if one does not conserve enough water.    It is notable that the state has a token budget for modifying or expanding the water storage, but even the popular Governor Schwarzenegger could not obtain legislative approval for a new major dam and lake.   In my view, it is never going to happen.   More water means more population, and that simply cannot be tolerated by those who run the state. 

State water managers also make the problem worse by wasting perfectly good water, letting the few storage lakes that exist send precious water down the rivers and into the ocean.  This is done, they claim, to provide adequate room in the storage reservoirs for the Spring snow melt and runoff.   The storage lakes perform double-duty in California, as is the case in many other states: the lakes mitigate or prevent catastrophic flooding, and they provide water year-round.   Many of the lakes also have a third purpose, they generate electricity as the water flows through hydraulic turbines.  (update: note that it is also nearly impossible, and quite time-consuming, to obtain all the permits required to desalinate seawater to provide fresh water to California.)

The next issue is transportation fuels.   The California utopia as seen by the Us Four And No More includes no gasoline cars, instead there will be only electric cars.  They also (not being engineers nor physics majors) intend to ban diesel fuel also.  No word yet on a ban on jet fuel.   With the universities having at least a few professors who understand such basics, it is a wonder that someone has not spoken out and explained that electric-powered trucks simply cannot transport the goods without rapidly draining the batteries.  It is also fairly difficult to imagine how jet airplanes will obtain enough power at sufficiently low weight to take off and fly, absent using jet fuel.  (update 1/13/2018:  Tesla has announced in late 2017 a fully-electric, battery-powered heavy truck for production in 2019 or 2020.   Time will tell if this is an economic choice for trucking companies; see link- end update).  

It is true that the ports in Los Angeles now have some electric-battery powered drayage trucks.   These exist only due to government mandates, not an economic improvement over existing diesel-powered trucks.   It is also true that a battery and solar-cell powered airplane flew in a much publicized trip last year, however, it failed in the round-the-world journey and stopped, exhausted and broken, in Hawaii.  

It seems that the California dreamers equate these things to events in the previous centuries, where if we can just prove it works, the thing will become commonplace.   The Wright brothers and the first airplane flight led to our aviation industry, they point out.   What is apparently lost on these dreamers is that a huge airplane, powered by batteries and solar cells, was able to barely keep itself aloft with one person, the pilot.   Filling a plane like that with 100 people as passengers, and the food and drink they will expect, and a bathroom, and soft chairs with cushioned seats, and various electronics to entertain them in the air, plus any luggage they will insist on bringing along, is simply out of the question for electric powered flight.   Any competent engineer or physics major can and should explain this to the California dreamers. 

Now, to the heavy industries and especially the oil refineries in California.   The dreamers want those shut down and permanently gone.  The goal is, as stated above, only electric vehicles.  One supposes that the state tax revenue that presently flows into the treasury from gasoline taxes will no longer be needed.  It is also somewhat unclear where the lubricating oils and greases will be manufactured to keep the electric vehicles operating and the wheels spinning.     More than this, it is certainly not clear how any construction work will be done, or maintenance of existing infrastructure, without diesel-powered heavy equipment such as cranes, bulldozers, and motor graders.  

Recently, I posted an article on SLB about the ExxonMobil refinery explosion in Torrance in February, 2015  see link.   One of the outcomes of investigations into that explosion is an increased call with greater fervor for yet more regulations on oil refineries.   There was an earlier fire in the Chevron refinery at Richmond, in the San Francisco Bay Area.   With their zealous desire to get rid of oil refineries, the legislature now is considering more stifling regulations (see link to Interagency Refinery Task Force, led by the California Department of Industrial Relations. )

There are of course other regulations in place in California, including climate-change prevention rules under California law AB 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.  These regulations also impact refineries in a negative manner, but refineries are not alone.  Cement plants, that provide the binder for making concrete used in construction, are also impacted. 

UPDATE 1:   Other future industries in California will include the shipping ports with their unloading and transporting containers across the country.  However, even there the Us Four And No More club made a valiant effort to shut down the ports: they required massive upgrades to the facilities, and forced visiting ships to use a lower-sulfur fuel.  The result, predictably, is a huge and modern port is now under construction in Mexico, where rail will take the containers full of cargo and send them north into the US.  

Airports will also likely continue, because all but the largest aircraft cannot fly much farther than the West Coast when making the trans-Pacific routes from Asia.    However, if and when technological improvements give aircraft longer range, it is already anticipated that many flights will fly over California on their way to destinations such as Dallas, Houston, Denver, and Chicago.   Such improvements already exist with the lighter construction, greater fuel efficiency and longer range as demonstrated by the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.

Finally, clean industries such as computer technology from Silicon Valley, and the entertainment industries such as tv and film will continue.    

-- End update 1. 

Conclusion

The California dreamers in the Us Four And No More club have a dream: 16 million people, zero industry, and only tourism to bring in money.  Apparently, they think that California is actually Hawaii-East, and tourists will flock to the coastal areas, spend their money and live it up.   Having lived here for 30 years and seen this all at work first-hand, it is now obvious how the game is played and what the end result is.    

It is of course an impossible dream, but the California dreamers have never let that give them pause.   

UPDATE 2: 1-17-2016 -  A bit more on the water issues in California.  Knowing that fresh water is a critical prerequisite to increased population, a state has only a very few choices.  

One, each person and business can consume less water, i.e. conservation.   This is what California has now mandated.  

Two, the state can manage its existing water supplies better, i.e. send less down the rivers into the oceans where it becomes unfit to drink (even for California elites).  This is what California refuses to do, manage the existing resources better.   As stated above, the locations exist for future dams and reservoirs but California refuses to build those. 

Three, the state can obtain additional water supplies from outside the state.  This also is what California refuses to do, with the minor and token exception of one or two very small seawater desalination plants.   Many opportunities exist to import fresh water, including my own idea of NEWTAP, as described here on SLB a few years ago.  see link.   Essentially, a canal or pipeline would be established from the Missouri River to northern New Mexico, where gravity would bring the water through existing rivers into the Colorado River for storage in the existing Lake Mead and Lake Powell.    There are other ways to import water, some are easier to accomplish than others; a pipeline from Canadian rivers to Los Angeles is one idea.  

Four, the state can recycle waste water back into clean water, i.e. treat the effluent water from wastewater treatment plants until it is sufficiently clean for human consumption.  This is another of the things California does.  One can only hope that not too many people become sick or die from drinking improperly purified water from the wastewater treatment plants.   

--  end update 2

Roger E. Sowell, Esq.
Marina del Rey, California

copyright (c) 2016 by Roger Sowell, all rights reserved. 







When Good Intentions Create Hazards - Storm Drain Flooding

Subtitle:  City Officials Plug Storm Drains - Puzzled by Flooding

Recent rains in the Los Angeles (California) area made the news because of street flooding, cars stranded, and people in peril from the flood waters.   What did not make the news, though, is a decision that was made some time ago that stops up the storm drains at the streets.  The streets flood because the water has no place to go.   See photo at right.
Street curb storm drain inlet with hinged debris barrier
in Los Angeles, CA photo by Roger Sowell
  


The debris barrier is a perforated, horizontal metal plate that is hinged at the top, and spring-loaded to remain closed.   The plate is to swing inward from the bottom when water pushes against the plate.   Debris is to be caught by the barrier and removed so that the storm drain piping system underground is not blocked.   At least, that is the theory.  In practice, the debris barrier shown in the photo was frozen shut.   The hinges did not allow the plate to move.   Only after a few strong kicks was a worker able to make the debris barrier move.  Even then, the spring tension was quite high for the intended purpose.  It is doubtful that the force from a few inches of water would overcome the spring tension and hold open the grate.   (I personally pushed the debris barrier to determine for myself how strong was the spring tension.)

So, in effect, Los Angeles has installed drain stoppers in thousands of locations.   This, just in time for the El Niño rains.   A recent news article (see link) describes the flooding in an area of Los Angeles, the San Fernando Valley (aka The Valley).  

Sometimes one has to stop and wonder at the actions of government.  Surely, there were good intentions behind the installation of thousands of debris barriers.  After all, it is a good idea to prevent sticks and trash from entering the storm drains since those can block or partially block the flow.   Ideally, only the rain goes down the drains.  However, one must also wonder if the city's decision-makers talked to any engineers about the negative effects of the debris barriers.   These are mechanical devices, relying on a plate that rotates about a hinge.  They are in an outdoor location, subject to the elements.   Even if they don't rust, they still will have dust, grit, grime, moisture, collect on the hinged areas.  The grit will grow in layer upon layer, until the force required to swing open the barrier is just too great for any water flow.  

There was substantial flooding in some areas in the last round of rains, about one week ago (January 5 and 6, 2016).   One news story showed a city worker in water up to his waist, using his feet to clear a clogged storm drain in the suburb of Sun Valley.   One can only imagine the difficulty in kicking open that debris barrier while standing in 3 feet of water.   

I also witnessed a few flooded intersections where I drive in my daily routines, on the same dates.  Having lived in the area for 30 years, I can say that those intersections never flooded before.   I did not stop to feel around on the storm drains in the rain, but it is quite apparent now that the rains have stopped that those intersections also have the drain plugs - excuse me, the debris barriers.  

Roger E. Sowell, Esq.
Marina del Rey, California
copyright (c) 2016 by Roger Sowell, all rights reserved